By His Holiness Danavir Goswami

(Vaiñëava Society Vol. 12)

In this paper, we’ll address concerns coming from devotees of Lord Krishna, vegans and others regarding the use of commercial, organic and devotional dairy products. We propose a four point plan/solution as follows:

1)      Resist the trend to boycott milk products
2)      Establish a comprehensive dairy certification system which includes total non-violent production (i.e. no slaughtering of cows or bulls)
3)      Revive sustainable farms using successful ISKCON farm models
4)      Encourage temples, restaurants, devotees and friends of Krishna to purchase dairy products from ISKCON farms or, if unavailable, from other high-principled farms

These measures should, if implemented, provide short-term and long-term benefits such as:

A)    a decrease of violence inflicted upon cows and bulls
B)    a decrease of dairy products adulteration
C)    an increase of dairy products available from protected and loved cows

Best Use of a Bad Bargain

To begin, let us consider the history of the International Society for Krishna Consciousness’ relationship with cows and dairy products over the past 42 years. When His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada (aka Srila Prabhupada) entered the USA in 1965, he found no dairy farms where cows and bulls were not cruelly treated and ultimately slaughtered for commercial purposes. He was already well aware of the West’s exploitation of cows and bulls as shown by what he wrote before he first sailed the Atlantic:

The next symptom of the age of Kali is the distressed condition of the cow. Milking the cow means drawing the principles of religion in a liquid form. The great åñis and munis [sages] would live only on milk. Çréla Çukadeva Gosvämé would go to a householder while he [the householder] was milking a cow, and he [Çréla Çukadeva Gosvämé] would simply take a little quantity of it for subsistence. Even fifty years ago, no one would deprive a sädhu [saintly person] of a quart or two of milk, and every householder would give milk like water. For a follower of Vedic principles, it is the duty of every householder to have cows and bulls as household paraphernalia, not only for drinking milk, but also for deriving religious principles.

The cow’s milk is required for the sacrificial fire, and by performing sacrifices the householder can be happy. The cow’s calf not only is beautiful to look at, but also gives satisfaction to the cow, and so she delivers as much milk as possible. But in the Kali-yuga, the calves are separated from the cows as early as possible for purposes which may not be mentioned in these pages of Çrémad-Bhägavatam. The cow stands with tears in her eyes, the çüdra milkman draws milk from the cow artificially, and when there is no milk the cow is sent to be slaughtered. These greatly sinful acts are responsible for all the troubles in present society. People do not know what they are doing in the name of economic development. The influence of Kali will keep them in the darkness of ignorance. Despite all endeavors for peace and prosperity, they must try to see the cows and the bulls happy in all respects. Foolish people do not know how one earns happiness by making the cows and bulls happy, but it is a fact by the law of nature. (Srimad Bhagavatam 1.17.3 Purport)

The word “tears” indicates the cows’ unhappiness and fear, the word “artificially,” designates forcible extraction methods used, and that which could not be mentioned in the “pages of Srimad-Bhagavatam” point to calves used for veal, and so on. He was well acquainted with how the tractor had replaced the bull in plowing fields since 1910. The dairy industry had begun injecting cows with growth hormones and other antibiotics since the 1930s.

“In 1937 scientists observed that milk yield increased when BST [Bovine Somatotropin] was administered to lactating cows. From the ’30s through the early ’80s, knowledge on chemical structure, function and activity of ST [Somatotropin] from several animal species increased.” (Wikipedia)

Strong pesticides had been used on agriculture fields since the 1940’s and cows were becoming confined to pens instead of pastures. No one understood the implications of man’s torturous inventions more than Srila Prabhupada who wrote about the link between sending millions of cows to the slaughterhouse and launching millions of young soldiers to fight and die on battlefields throughout the world. He knew that all American bovines would be slaughtered as soon as their fattening and milking periods had expired.

He knew it was not possible to get pure commercial milk. Why only pure milk, it was impossible to get pure water, pure air, pure vegetables, pure fruits or pure grains anymore.

So long we are in the material platform, the goodness is liable to be adulterated. Just like we purchase milk from the market or anything. There is adulteration. Although there are so many laws by the government, “You cannot adulterate, you cannot do this, you cannot…,” but people, propensity is to adulterate. So you cannot get pure thing. The whole atmosphere is so polluted. (From a lecture by Srila Prabhupada given in Los Angeles, October 1, 1972)

Yet with all the pollution and adulterations, his mission was to establish the Vedic civilization on the basis of cows and their milk products. Thus, like a swan takes milk from a milk-water solution, Srila Prabhupada utilized essential milk leaving aside the contaminated consciousness of the dairy industry.

Yajïa, the performance of sacrifice, is essential; to perform yajïa, clarified butter is absolutely necessary; and to get clarified butter, milk is necessary. Milk is produced when there are sufficient cows. (Srimad Bhagavatam 8.8.1, Purport)

It is most significant that to counteract cow slaughter he never refrained from using commercial dairy products for offering to the Lord, for his personal consumption nor for the eating of his movements’ followers.

Why did he do so?

Creating Intelligent People

He wanted to establish a civilization based on Lord Krsna, the cow and Vedic wisdom and to do that he would have to utilize whatever milk products were available in the market until his society could produce its own. There was simply no alternative to using cows’ milk for higher intellect and he knew that despite the adulterations found in modern milk the essential aspects of milk were retained.

The body can be maintained by any kind of foodstuff, but cow’s milk is particularly essential for developing the finer tissues of the human brain so that one can understand the intricacies of transcendental knowledge. (Srimad Bhagavatam 3.5.7, Purport)

He decided to “make the best use of a bad bargain” by using commercial dairy products on the basis of Cäëakya Paëòita’s maxim: viñäd apy amåtaà grähyam amedhyäd api käïcanam (take the nectar from the pot of poison or take gold from a filthy place). He appealed to the intelligence of his audience but in order for them to understand his subtle spiritual message, they would require fine brain tissues—rejecting commercial dairy products was not possible.

Srila Prabhupada wanted to create intelligent persons who could understand the philosophy of Krishna consciousness and convince others by logic and reason. In the vegetarian diet, milk plays an essential role by providing vitamin B12 (cobalamin). Most animals have micro-organisms in their stomachs that produce B12, but human beings do not. Their only natural sources of B12 are meat and milk. The body needs vitamin B12 to properly develop red blood cells. A deficiency can cause pernicious and megaloblastic anemia. For anyone trying to understand the subtleties of spiritual science, possibly the most important role of vitamin B12 is that it helps maintain proper functioning of the nervous system, including brain cells. Ninety percent of the B12 remains after pasteurization, and seventy percent remains after boiling from two to five minutes.

So if you get milk products, milk, then you can prepare so many preparations full of vitamins, which will nourish your brain. Dull brain cannot understand what is spiritual knowledge. Therefore, that Mr. Bernard Shaw, he wrote a book. Perhaps you know it. You Are What You Eat. If you keep your brain dull, then how you can understand? Because without becoming very intelligent man, one cannot understand Kåñëa consciousness. That is stated in the Caitanya-caritämåta, kåñëa yei bhaje sei baòa catura: “One who takes to Kåñëa consciousness seriously and perfectly, he must be very, very intelligent.” Dull brain cannot accept it. Bahünäà janmanäm ante jïänavän mäà prapadyate. So we have to make our brain very clean. And for that purpose you require to drink not very much, at least, one pound or half-pound milk daily. That is essential. (From a lecture by Srila Prabhupada given in Hawaii, January 15, 1974)

Srila Prabhupada deemed that the best approach was powerful preaching of Krishna consciousness through literature and other media as well as demonstrating cow protection in rural farm communities. He said:

Just like we say “Don’t eat meat.” So actually, if all people become Kåñëa conscious and give up meat-eating, then the slaughterhouse will be closed. Automatically.  (From a lecture by Srila Prabhupada given in Los Angeles, June 20, 1972)

His strategy proved extraordinarily successful—the spreading Krishna consciousness movement has produced a sizable army of sincere pure Vaisnava devotee/preachers dedicated to the task of cow protection. In addition, as a side effect, the movement has influenced virtually millions to give up eating meat for good.

Health Issues

Some people criticized milk saying that it was unhealthy but Srila Prabhupada did not accept it. He knew that was a myth. In India, milk is usually boiled to kill the bacteria, and people drink the milk hot and sweetened with sugar. Prabhupäda taught devotees to drink milk “sipping hot”-so hot you have to sip it. Boiling the milk breaks down the protein so it is easier to digest. In America the milk is pasteurized but not boiled. It’s also homogenized, and people drink it cold. He said that cold milk loses its nutritional value. The theory of “lactose intolerance” may have some connection with these things.

Srila Prabhupada knew that according to the Äyur Veda, warm milk straight from the cow promotes strength and stimulates the digestion. Hot boiled milk alleviates mucus and won’t put fat on the body. It also helps calm the nerves. He drank a glass of hot milk every evening just before taking rest.

Less intelligent people underestimate the value of cow’s milk. Cow’s milk is also called gorasa, or the juice from the body of the cow. Milk is the most valuable form of gorasa, and from milk we can prepare many important and valuable foodstuffs for the upkeep of the human body.  (From a lecture by Srila Prabhupada given in Hawaii, January 15, 1974)

He knew that milk was full of vitamins and science confirms that it contains protein, carbohydrates, vitamins A, D, E, and K, calcium, niacin, phosphorus, magnesium, potassium, riboflavin, and sodium, as well as other minerals. Each of these nutrients makes an important contribution to human health. Proteins, for example, are composed of amino acids, which build and maintain body tissues, fight off disease, transport oxygen in the blood, regulate blood sugar, aid in making the hormones that regulate our metabolism, and supply energy.

Calcium, also found abundantly in milk, is required for the blood to clot and for the heart to function normally. And it protects the teeth by neutralizing the cavity-forming acids in foods. Western science acknowledges that cow’s milk has been a used as a nutritious food source in human society for millennia.

 The milk is produced by the cow, but it is not meant for the cow. It is meant for the human being. If you offer the milk, 30 pounds of milk, after milking the cow, and if you offer to the cow, it will refuse. It will refuse, “I don’t want it.” Give it dry grass? Oh, it will be very glad. So everything is organized by the nature… Natural foodstuff which is meant for human being, they are full of vitamins already there by nature’s law, by God’s wish. (From a lecture by Srila Prabhupada given in New York, May 23, 1966)

Another reason that Srila Prabhupada decided to make use of commercial dairy products was that man craves animal fat and blood.

Protection and grazing ground for the cows are among the essential needs for society and the welfare of people in general. The animal fat required for the human body can be well derived from cow’s milk. Cow’s milk is very important for human energy, and the economic development of society depends on sufficient food grains, sufficient milk, and sufficient transportation and distribution of these products. Lord Çré Kåñëa, by His personal example, taught us the importance of cow protection, which is meant not only for the Indian climate but for all human beings all over the universe.  (From a lecture by Srila Prabhupada given in Hawaii, January 15, 1974)

He knew that milk is actually the blood of the cow miraculously transformed into milk. The cow eats grass, the grass becomes blood then the blood becomes milk, which we can drink as it is or prepare it in many different ways. Srila Prabhupada knew that by using milk products, such as panir fried in ghee, which tasted similar to meat, the hearts of the non-devotees would change. He would use dairy products in prasadam to replace meat products in their diet.

It is a very good idea for people to come to our vegetarian restaurant and take so many nice things, especially the panir, fried cheese, and sandesh, kachori, rasagulla, samosa and in this way they will forget their meat-eating. If you make a soup of fried panir with asafoetida and ginger, this will replace lobster soup nonsense. Of course we are not interested in giving them vegetarian food; we are wanting to give them prasadam. Then gradually they will become devotees. (From a letter written by Srila Prabhupada to Tusta Krsna, 9 November, 1975)

Treasure from the Condemned

Although innocent cows used on factory farms were abused and butchered, Srila Prabhupada saw them as glorious mothers to man. As God’s representative in human society, it was his duty to engage the poor cows and other dairy employees, etc. in service to Krishna before their untimely deaths. If an innocent man condemned to death in a concentration camp wishes to present his only hidden treasure to Lord Krishna, the Lord’s servant will not refuse to offer it. Srila Prabhupada spoke of ajnata sukrti by which any soul who, even unknowingly or accidentally, renders some service to Krishna is greatly benefited and becomes elevated spiritually. The pitiable factory farm cows were like stranded devotees, without good association and Srila Prabhupada could not refuse to offer their milk and service attitude to Krsna. Why should their offerings be denied? Simply by Krsna’s drinking the witch’s poison milk, Putana was liberated back to Goloka in the spiritual world, then what to speak of the incarcerated cows who were giving their milk with no ill intent? Taking milk of cows that may later be slaughtered does not in any way condone cow-killing, and if they had the opportunity, devotees would close the slaughterhouses immediately.

Srila Prabhupada knew it was the duty of intelligent and religious people to offer milk to the Lord and accept the remnants as prasadam. Thousands of generations of respecting and protecting cows could not be erased by a relatively recent Western slaughterhouse craze.

Vegan and Vedic

The devotees of Krishna derive their philosophy and practice regarding cows and dairy products through the Vedic body of literature which has guided an enlightened society for a hundred thousand generations from the time Ramayana was written by Sri Valmiki Muni.

Veganism began in 1944 when vegetarians Elsie Shrigley and Donald Watson decided to found the UK Vegan Society in England hoping to help man and animals. They defined veganism as follows:

The word “veganism” denotes a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude — as far as is possible and practical — all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of humans, animals and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals.

Let us compare vegan and Vedic views regarding cows and dairy products.

Agreement Between Vedic Culture And Veganism

1)      Cows and bulls should never be killed by humans.
2)      Cows and bulls should never be mistreated by humans—including:
               a. Injecting them with growth-promoting hormones such as steroids, estrogens, progestins, etc.
               b. Cows should not be artificially impregnated for business.
               c. Cows and bulls should not be subjected to poor living conditions.
               d. Cows and bulls should not be fed unnatural diets including meat and fish by-products, etc.
3)      Cows should not be divorced from their calves

In a factory farm, when the cow can’t give milk anymore, she is slaughtered for her meat. Also, the male calves born at the dairy are sent to the slaughterhouse very soon after birth. Both vegans and followers of Vedic culture share condemnation of such action.

Disagreement Between Vedic Culture And Veganism

1)      Humans engagement and/or acceptance of services from cows and bulls.
2)      The health of dairy products for humans.
3)      Calf-exclusivity for drinking cows’ milk.

Let’s examine the differing views on these three issues.

1) Humans’ engagement and/or acceptance of services from cows and bulls.

Vegan view:

Animals should not have to work for humans and humans have no right to use animal products. Using dairy products is unnatural since no other animal except the human drinks the milk of another species. Appalled by the dairy industry’s collusion with the slaughterhouse, the vegan advocates shun the cow’s milk as well as her meat.

Vedic view:

All creatures (including animals, plants, insects, etc.) are meant to be actively employed in the service of the Lord with humans acting as chief organizers. The bull helps in the agricultural process of producing grain, etc., and thus in one sense the bull is the father of humankind, whereas the cow is the mother, for she supplies milk to human society. As soon as man stops working the bull and milking the cow he wants to kill them.

Discussion

A) Humans are unique in several ways:

  1.    they can offer sacrifices to Visnu meant for elevation of consciousness,
  2.    they can use their brains to understand philosophy aiming toward self-realization and what Sri Krsna thinks about cows’ milk.
  3.    they have the ability and carpal dexterity to milk a cow,

B) Non-human species cannot milk cows (for lack of proper hands) yet practically all species of quadrapeds plus many reptiles, fish, birds, insects, etc. will readily consume dairy products if it is supplied to them. Non-human species also do not till fields and grow food grains but that is not a good argument for humans to refrain from using food grains.

 

2) The health of dairy products for humans.

 Vegan view:

 Cow’s milk is simply unhealthy for human consumption. Some leading vegan websites go so far as to say that “milk is pus!” and that “beer is better than milk for humans,” etc.

Vedic view:

According to Vedic science, milk has been recognized and utilized as an extraordinary healthful human food for millions of years. Milk strengthens the entire human body and nourishes the finer brain tissues facilitating the understanding of higher spiritual principles.

If we really want to cultivate the human spirit in society we must have first-class intelligent men to guide the society, and to develop the finer tissues of our brains we must assimilate vitamin values from milk. Devotees worship Lord Çré Kåñëa by addressing Him as the well-wisher of the brähmaëas and the cows. The most intelligent class of men, who have perfectly attained knowledge in spiritual values, are called the brähmaëas. No society can improve in transcendental knowledge without the guidance of such first-class men, and no brain can assimilate the subtle form of knowledge without fine brain tissues. For such important brain tissues we require a sufficient quantity of milk and milk preparations. Ultimately, we need to protect the cow to derive the highest benefit from this important animal. The protection of cows, therefore, is not merely a religious sentiment but a means to secure the highest benefit for human society. (Light of the Bhagavata: verse 28)

 Krishna drinks milk and eats milk products—it is part of His devotees’ diet. The Vedas say:

namo brahmaëya-deväya

go-brähmaëa-hitäya ca

jagad-dhitäya kåñëäya

govindäya namo namaù

 “My Lord, You are the well-wisher of the cows and the brähmaëas, and You are the well-wisher of the entire human society and world.” (Viñëu Puräëa 1.19.65)

 The world’s longest surviving culture is based on drinking milk, the most valuable food.

Discussion:

Neither chemically nor physiologically could milk be classified as pus. Pus is a thick whitish-yellow fluid which results from the accumulation of white blood cells, liquefied tissue and cellular debris and is commonly a site of infection. Pus has never been used by human society as a food source.

Although some persons prefer beer to milk, that does not make it healthier for the humans’ body, brain, mind and soul. The active principle of beer is a drug molecule (alcohol) distributed to all the organs and fluids of the consumer’s human body, but alcohol affects mostly the brain. Like other general anesthetics, alcohol is a central nervous system depressant.

Dr. Gary Wadler, a New York University School of Medicine professor summarizes the extremely well documented detrimental short-term effects of alcohol. Impairments are listed below:

  • Balance and steadiness
  • Reaction time
  • Fine and complex motor skills
  • Information processing
  • Boisterousness, unsteadiness, slurred speech
  • Nausea, vomiting, marked unsteadiness, drowsiness
  • Hangovers, the residual or “day-after” effect of alcoholic consumption, can result in symptoms of headaches, nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, dehydration, and body aches.
  • The chronic [long term] abuse of beer (alcohol) may cause numerous adverse health effects which include:
  • Chronic alteration of brain and nerve function
  • Weakening of heart muscle
  • Testicular shrinkage and male breast enlargement
  • Impotency
  • Elevated triglycerides
  • Fat deposits in the liver
  • Cirrhosis and liver failure
  • Blood-clotting abnormalities
  • Pancreatitis
  • Vitamin deficiencies
  • Chronic skin alterations
  • Death

To exalt beer over milk is quite irresponsible.

3) Cows’ milk exclusively for calves. 

Vegan view:

The cow’s milk is meant only for her calf.

Vedic view:

The Vedas describe a natural relationship between God and the cows, and also between mankind and the cows. Cows’ milk is a divine arrangement to supply one of human society’s prime necessities. Lord Krsna personally emphasized the importance of cows’ milk for humanity by taking the occupation of a cowherd boy. The Bhagavad-gita ordains an occupation of cow protection for supplying milk products to humanity.

Discussion:

According to recent statistics, the average cow yields 19,576 pounds of milk per year. This converts to 7,118 liters per year or 19.5 liters (approximately 5 gallons) per day. For the first ten days after birth, a calf drinks only its mother’s milk. According to agricultural authorities, a calf needs to drink its mother’s milk equaling about 1/10 of its body weight. The average calf birth weight is about 82 pounds, thus the calf takes about 8.2 pounds of mother’s milk for the first 10 days. After ten days, the calf starts eating grass in addition to taking mother’s milk to its “full satisfaction.” According to ISKCON’s Minister of Agriculture for Europe, a very experienced, compassionate and savvy person, that “full satisfaction” translates to approximately one quarter of the mother cow’s daily output or approximately 5 liters per day. At Bhaktivedanta Manor Farm in the United Kingdom, calves are weaned from drinking milk after about six months. The leaders there estimate that the minimum average lactation period for Western breeds of cows is about 3.5 years after giving birth to a calf. If we use 19.5 liters per day as an average yield, it means that a cow gives about 12,460 liters over the 3.5 year lactation period for each calf she bears. Of that, (12,460 liters or 3,296 gallons), approximately 900 liters are drunk by the calf. This equals close to 7.2% of the mother’s total milk yield.

The remaining 92.8% of the cow’s yield is meant for human consumption which is why it has been practiced since time immemorial. The cow simply produces far more milk than her calf requires for health. On the other hand, mankind requires the milk products which provide all the necessary nutrients for its physical, mental and spiritual health.

               

Enter “Conditional Veganism”

In an attempt to reconcile both vegan and Vedic conclusions, a new ideology called “conditional veganism,” materialized in the 1990’s. This term was coined primarily by a former devotee who hailed from a punk-rock/vegan background but who later became estranged from Krishna consciousness. In essence, conditional veganism acknowledges that man should engage and accept services from cows and bulls, including cows’ milk which is intended for and is healthy for humanity. A conditional vegan agrees, at least theoretically, to accept dairy products produced from protected and loved cows, however, the conditional vegan registers a complaint against all the farm factory’s atrocities by boycotting commercial dairy products.

Conditional veganism asserts the following opinions:

Conditional vegan assertion #1: The Gita Proposes a Non-Dairy Diet.

 Even in the Bhagavad-Gita Krishna says, “if one offers me fruit, vegetables, a flower or water…” That is a vegan diet!

Discussion:

On this subject, a purport to the Narada Bhakta Sutra 14 states:

The Lord clearly says that He will accept a flower, a fruit, a leaf, or a little water if they are offered to Him with devotional love. (One should note that the Supreme Lord accepts only foods from the vegetable kingdom, as well as milk products. “Water” includes milk and its products.)

In the verse referred to above, namely 9.26, Krsna says:

patraà puñpaà phalaà toyaà

yo me bhaktyä prayacchati

tad ahaà bhakty-upahåtam

açnämi prayatätmanaù

 

If one offers Me with love and devotion a leaf, a flower, fruit or water, I will accept it.

In addition to the word “toyam” indicating water, Srila Prabhupada includes milk within the “toyam” category as well. Here are a few instances:

So Krsna eats all these thingspatram puspam phalam toyamvegetables, liquid things, water, milk, and so many other things, grains. (From a lecture by Srila Prabhupada given in Bombay, April 10, 1974)

And Kåñëa says, patraà puñpaà phalaà toyaà yo me bhaktyä prayacchati “A leaf, a flower, fruit and liquid, milk or water, all these things, within these categories, whatever a devotee offers Me in love and devotion, I eat.” (From a lecture by Srila Prabhupada given in Melbourne, June 25, 1974)

 The exact meaning for the word toyaà according to the Technical Sanskrit to English Dictionary (© Robert L. Peck 2007) is “fluid” which is why Srila Prabhupada places milk in the category of toyam.

Besides this, Lord Krsna is famous as a cow milker and milk drinker. Therefore, it will be mistaken to use the Bhagavad-gita verse to support a non-dairy diet. We cannot take one part of the lesson and reject the other and that is why it is imperative to hear from the guru in studying the sastras.

Conditional vegan assertion #2: Veganism is the only Alternative for City-Dwellers.

For those who live far from farms and must buy milk from the store, it seems that abstaining from milk products is the only choice. A vegan diet is the only option for cow protection living in the city.

Discussion:

 Devotees living in city centers of the International Society for Krishna Consciousness are basically trying to remove a thorn with a thorn. In other words, they are using modern technology to change modern technological society. Consequently, they sometimes have to compromise by drinking store-bought milk, but by their preaching in the cities, many people are becoming vegetarians, and therefore cows are being saved. If but one person is convinced to become a vegetarian by such preaching, many animals are saved each year. What if that person stays a vegetarian for the next thirty years? How many creatures are being saved? To be really effective, devotees need to situate themselves in the cities; otherwise, if tucked away in the country somewhere, the influence would be minimal. However, devotees do both—they’re in the cities and also in the country. And vegetarianism is just one benefit of ISKCON’s work, because if a person is Kåñëa conscious, he’s automatically going to be kind and gentle and possess all good qualities. Devotees are confident that the poor cows are greatly blessed when their milk is offered to the beautiful Deities in the temple.

If city-dwelling devotees, living in temples and in private homes, boycott commercial dairy products, it disregards the policy Srila Prabhupada himself established.

If you drink more milk and milk products, then your brain will be very sharp. You will understand things very nicely, correctly. Therefore milk is very important. (From a lecture by Srila Prabhupada given in Johannesburg, October 20, 1975)

 Srila Prabhupada tirelessly taught society to stop animal slaughter and beef-eating yet he never encouraged them to stop drinking milk or using dairy products. Unless the cows and bulls are engaged positively by humanity and until human society recognizes the authority of a cow-loving Supreme Being, so-called momentary gains soon turn toxic. Srila Prabhupada writes:

Nowadays, unqualified men have taken the presidential post. And although they may pose themselves as very religious, they are simply rascals. Why? Because under their noses thousands of cows are being killed, while they collect a good salary. Any leader who is at all religious should resign his post in protest if cow slaughter goes on under his rule. (Journey of Self Discovery 7.1)

Conditional vegan assertion #3: The atrocities of factory farming are too overwhelming to tolerate. Consuming commercial milk products supports a cruel industry of animal exploitation.

Discussion:

There are a growing number of organic farms today which do not use growth hormones and antibiotics on the cows and do not feed them meat products and do provide satisfactory living conditions for the cows. Consequently, several of the concerns voiced by conditional vegans are no longer unavoidable.

We will discuss alternatives to factory farming in the next sections.

Dairy Certification System

I propose that the construction of a comprehensive system for certification of all dairy products in North America would fulfill the following purposes:

1)      To promote an awareness of the differences in purity and morality of dairy products and to rate them accordingly
2)      To educate the consumer as to the ingredients within dairy products
3)      To educate the consumer as to the treatment of the cows who provided the dairy products
4)      To educate the consumer as to the methods employed in producing the dairy products
5)      To stimulate a higher level of purity and morality in dairy products
6)      To educate the consumer as to where he/she may purchase different levels of dairy products at what prices and availability

Although not complete, the Cornucopia Institute (http://cornucopia.org/index.php/dairy_brand_ratings/) presently lists 42 American farms as outstanding or excellent in supplying dairy products to nationwide and regional markets. The chart below shows the organic farms whose standards were rated the highest:

 

cow chart 1

 

 

The top seven farms listed above scored perfect in all the categories of production used. A “Five Cow” rating is the best, “Four Cow” next best and so on down to One Cow” rating. The criteria for the rating are given below.

APPENDIX 3: DAIRY BUYER’S GUIDE.
ASSUMPTIONS/BASIS FOR RATINGS

Points                                                Production Aspect

1. Market Area

2. Ownership Structure

100                                Farmstead dairy (owned and operated by resident farm family)
90                                  Farmer-owned cooperative
80                                  Family-owned business with close ties/partnership with farmers
70                                  Corporate/investor owned with deep roots/ties with farmers
65                                  Stonyfield: unique governance policy with Hirshberg family
60                                  Investor-owned corporation
50                                  Investor-owned corporation with questionable track record
25                                  Any ownership with history as a “bad actor”
0                                    No answer

3. Milk Supply

100                                Farmstead dairy
95                                  Farmstead dairy, buys additional milk from neighbors
90                                  Cooperative/small corporation/multiple farms (from own patrons)
85                                  50% or more from own patrons plus a highly rated supplier
70                                  Purchases some outside milk from highly rated suppliers
60                                  Purchases subcontracted out without direct control
50                                  Purchases some percentage of milk from “open market”
0–30                             Purchases some percentage of milk from confinement dairies

(points depend on percentage)

0                                    No answer

4. Disclosure/Farm Contact Information for Verification

100                             Full disclosure
0–90                           Partial disclosure (points depend on number of questions fully answered)

5/6. Farm Certifier

Ratings (0–100) for certifiers are based on the history and integrity of the certifying organization

and its history of approving certification of farms that are suspected of creating/exploiting

loopholes in the current regulations.

CCOF California Certified Organic Farmers

COFA California Organic Farmers Association

GOA Global Organic Alliance

ICO Indiana Certified Organic

IDALS Iowa Dept of Agriculture and Land Stewardship

Integrity Certified International

MOSA Midwest Organic Service Association

cow chart 2 

The rating system shown above is impressive, yet as of this date, there appear to be almost no farms in North America which never send the cows or bulls to slaughter, with the exception of ISKCON farms. The problem is that the ISKCON farms are not producing a very large quantity of milk due to many reasons. If there is a demand for totally non-violent dairy products, which is likely, then ISKCON farms may charge the price they require to cover their expenses and/or expand the number of farms. Successful Krishna-conscious farm models from around the world that fully utilize bulls for tilling and other duties should be implemented. An expert predicts that very soon farms other than those of ISKCON, will also supply dairy products from cows that are never to be slaughtered nor have their offspring slaughtered. Interestingly enough, just yesterday at the Sunday feast, a devotee who maintains cows, told me that he knows of a commercial dairy farmer in Iowa that does not send his milking cows to slaughter after they have ceased giving milk. He allows them to live out their natural lifespan.

A complete dairy certification system including a special category for totally non-violent products would supply a consumer with everything knowable about all the dairy products offered in North America. The consumer would find out how much of the product is available, from what outlets, at what price, etc. This will encourage consumers to purchase the type of dairy product they wish and it will allow small dairies who may put forward higher quality dairy goods to sell them at a price which can sustain them.

We can imagine how an ISKCON farm community will respond when they have standing orders for their highest-rated totally non-violent dairy products at the price they request. Such farms will be able to expand their milk production and protect more cows, giving more quality milk to Krishna and the public. As consumers, and as role models to millions, we need to understand the power of our food choices.

In this way, a consumer who cannot tolerate to take dairy products from a company that abuses and slaughters the cows will have the means to find dairy products that meet his liking. Let’s fight fire with fire. This is a supply and demand market nation and we can now fulfill our demands.

Small and Large Scale Milk Production

One misconception existing today puts forward that cow protection and milk production should only be implemented on a small scale by individual families. While it is surely ideal that every family maintains a cow or two for their family’s dairy needs, or a farm community only supply enough for its immediate use, modern city-living makes it difficult to implement. Although some devotee experts correctly caution that using petroleum conveyances to transport dairy products long distances is impractical in the long run, however, at present it is functional. We can successfully use the current available arrangement of dairy transportation for the meantime and at the same time push forward with great enthusiasm in developing our own sustainable farms.

Srila Prabhupada advised Sumati Morarji and the Gujarati and Marwari business communities to organize cow protection on a large scale. Read the excerpt below to experience another facet of Srila Prabhupada’s genius for accomplishing the goal of replacing slaughterhouses:

I can suggest as you have asked me to give a thought to this problem, that Goseva, according to our Vedic injunction, is specially entrusted to the mercantile community. Of course, during the Hindu government in India, the kings were mostly Vaisnavas like Maharaja Pariksit, and he at once caught the Black man Kali who was attempting to kill a cow. But those days are no more. Neither there is a king like Maharaja Pariksit, nor the present government of India is inclined to give protection to the cows. But the mercantile community, specially the Gujaratis and the Marwaris are undoubtedly rich in India, and I do not know why such mercantile communities do not open large-scale dairy farms. That will certainly give actual protection to the cows. From Bhagavad-gita we understand that the Vaisya community is specially responsible for giving protection to the cows as much as the ksatriya kings are responsible for giving protection to the citizens of the state. As such, if you can organize—and I believe you can do so, because by Grace of Krishna, you are in good position amongst the mercantile community—big dairy farms with large pasturing grounds, then the problem of milk supply and cow protection will automatically be done. I do not know how much you will appreciate my this suggestion, but if you can do such organization, it will be a great service to the country and to the animals, and to this cause of Krishna Consciousness. If you be serious on this point then I can help you with all of my possible energies. (From a letter written by Srila Prabhupada to Sumati Morarjee —1969)

There is nothing wrong with vaisya businessmen organizing cow protection on a mega scale and turning a large profit from the milk. To a devotee in Canada, Srila Prabhupada confirmed that taking profit from selling home-grown food items was an acceptable means of acquiring funds.

“If you can support yourselves by selling certain of your crops grown there, why not?” (From a letter written by Srila Prabhupada: May 29, 1971)

The vaisyas can market the excess milk products, make money and organize more cow protection.

Vaiçya, they should be trained in three things, productive—kåñi-go-rakñya-väëijyaà vaiçya-karma svabhäva-jam—kåñi, agriculture; go-rakñya, cow protection. Go-rakñya. That is essential, agricultural and cow protection. And väëijyam. Väëijyam means trade. If there is excess milk product, if there is excess grain product, then you can sell to others. (From a lecture by Srila Prabhupada given in Los Angeles, December 29, 1973)

In the discussion below at Bombay, Srila Prabhupada appreciates the profits made from the Gita Nagari farm cow protection program.

In one farm, Philadelphia, they are producing so much milk that they are selling $1500 per month. And they’ve arranged so nice, and big tank. And the pipes regularly as they do in dairy farm. When it is not working, only hot water is passing through the pipes to keep them clean. And one cow, the milk bag is so big. He gives 102 pounds daily. Similarly, in France also we have got farm. New Orleans, Philadelphia, West Virginia, we have got four or five. (From an evening darsana given by Srila Prabhupada: August 14, 1976, Bombay)

Below, Srila Prabhupada approves of the plan to have dairies with large number of milking cows.

Devotee (reading an newspaper article): Besides regular free nutritional food distribution program, ISKCON is also planning to set up a model high-yielding 600-cow dairy farm, Prabhupäda: A very important article. (Room Conversation: August 22, 1976, Hyderabad)

Prabhupäda: Somebody is proposing to give us some dairy land? Dairy.
Tamäla Kåñëa: Dairy land in Agra?
Prabhupäda: Agra?
Tamäla Kåñëa: I heard also someone was proposing. One man who’s staying here now is proposing four acres in Agra. They went today to see it. I think Bhagatjé went and also Akñayänanda Mahäräja. They’ll give you a report on it.
Prabhupäda: Supply of ghee from that dairy land would be very good. (Room Conversation—Recent Mail: July 14, 1977, Våndävana)

Buying from Our Farms

Perhaps fifteen years ahead of his time, a thoughtful devotee wrote the following in 1992. In my opinion, he has really presented a viable plan which deserves to be implemented in ISKCON tout de suite.

If we are to establish Kåñëa consciousness, it is imperative that we live our philosophy and support cow protection by supporting employment of the cows and oxen.

But it doesn’t seem we are doing so well in that regard. Looking over the information about the farms, I noticed with interest that only a small number of the cows are actually being milked. For example, at Gétä Nagari 2 of 69 were fresh [newly calved and therefore milking], and I suspect that more are dry than retired.

A devotee friend of mine explained to me that it’s a matter of economics: the farms simply cannot afford to keep the cows fresh. I heard this with great astonishment. If we as a society are committed to cow protection, then we must arrange for it to make sense economically. Otherwise, as the article pointed out, cow protection will be abandoned.

Every temple, I am sure, uses large amounts of milk products. Why aren’t these products of our own farms? My friend pointed out that the temples can buy dairy products from the store for less than what it costs to make them ourselves, because the store products are government subsidized.

But is that an excuse? That means we value dollars above cow protection. As a society we spend millions of dollars a year to distribute books and prasädam because we understand the great need for these programs, even though they may not pay for themselves. Why should cow protection be considered less important?

Many nondevotee vegetarians shun commercial dairy products because these products are linked to the slaughter of calves. Yet we, who profess to champion cow protection, buy these products instead of our own dairy produce because they’re cheaper.

This doesn’t make sense, nor is it morally sound. We should offer our own nonviolent dairy products. Charge what we must, there are people out there willing to pay for it to support the principles they (and we) believe in.

—Dhaneçvara Däsa

It looks like the time has come to implement Dhanesvara’s idea. ISKCON Europe’s minister of agriculture, Syamasundara dasa Adhikari, recently shared his similar thoughts as follows:

In our society I feel that we are not willing to pay the real price for our milk and this I feel is one of the reasons why cow protection is not being supported and promoted as much as it appeared when Srila Prabhupada was with us. Generally our farms, temples and restaurants buy cheap and consequently they seem not to have enough money to buy the farm milk products at a price that enables it to be produced. If our own ISKCON projects agreed to pay the real sustainable price for devotionally-procured milk then I am sure it will create a wave of new farms.

This is the crux of the dilemma. High quality, devotionally-surcharged milk from loved-cows living on devotee farms costs more to bring forth than factory farm milk where government subsidies and every conceivable penny-pinching, cut-throat scheme is employed. Thus the price for cow protection’s higher quality milk should be borne in each gallon purchased. It’s kind of like buying books from BBT—others may print them but Srila Prabhupada wanted to use BBT for many strengthening reasons.

Dhaneçvara Däsa will be pleased to know that the devotees in Europe are thinking along the same lines as he and have instituted a plan. HH Sivarama Swami says that the ultimate solution is to have farming communities as Srila Prabhupada wanted where cow protection is a priority. For this reason Srila Prabhupada said to keep as many cows as possible, which is a tall order. But if we do keep as many cows as possible, and if we have cow protection, and if devotees and congregation members are actually protecting those cows and maintaining them, then we can have enough milk to provide temples and congregation members and everyone with milk.

At a recent ISKCON European leaders’ meeting, a regulation was passed obliging all temples, restaurants and projects to take vegetables and dairy products from the farm projects at the real price of production. The only limitation is that if by doing so the purchasing project comes under financial difficulty then they will not have to pay the full price. The supplier will have to present their financial information (if required) to justify any prices. The products will also have to be in a reasonable condition.

This means, in a nut shell, that if the farm can supply the products that are being used, the projects have to buy at the cost needed to grow it. This regulation, in effect, gives a guaranteed market for our entrepreneurial growers. It significantly swings the weight in the favor of the grower and hopefully will give a significant boost to our farm production. This regulation is presently only applicable to Europe but may be of equal interest and benefit for all our farm projects.

I agree that consumers within ISKCON and the greater society will pay the market price for higher grade (totally non-violent) dairy products if they know what goes into them and what  happens and what does not happen to the cows that give the milk. Generating a market for premium protected milk will stimulate our own projects into remembering the value of home-produced milk. Then the next step will be to engage bulls in non-tractor, non-petroleum, non-violent agriculture for supplying our projects and others.

hungary gosala

Above: The beautiful gosala at New Vraja-dhama, Hungary, home to happy cows and bulls

Conclusion

Philosophical Principles:

  1. No one has done more for cow protection in modern times than Srila Prabhupada.
  2. The Vedas consider cows’ milk intrinsically healthy and essential for human beings.
  3. The cows’ special duty is supplying milk to Lord Krsna and to humanity.
  4. Humans, acting as guardians, have dominion over the animals to engage them as assistants in the service of the Lord.
  5. By preventing cows from executing their duties, man inflicts violence upon them because violence can be defined as “checking one from doing his rightful duty.”
  6. A human diet without dairy products causes brain malnourishment and thus inhibits one’s ability to understand spiritual subjects.

Ethical Concerns:

  1. The highest ethical standard regarding dairy products is found in the Vedas.
  2. Non-Vedic man-made plans are flawed with the four defects of mistakes, illusion, imperfect senses and cheating.
  3. Accusing commercial dairy consumers to be guilty of complicity with cow slaughter is very risky for spiritual advancement.
  4. Non-devotee farms should be encouraged to let cows and bulls die naturally before eating them.

Goals:

  1. To work toward eliminating cow slaughter and abuse
  2. To achieve a higher standard of diary products in the world.
  3. To realize sustainable devotional cow protection programs.

Practical Action Plan:

  1. To establish a dairy certification system which includes totally non-violent milk products (i.e. milk that has been received by cows that, along with their calves, will never be slaughtered)
  2. Revive sustainable farms using successful ISKCON cow-protection models.
  3. Encourage temples, restaurants, devotees and friends of Krishna to purchase dairy products from ISKCON farms or, if unavailable, from other high-principled farms.
  4. Brahmanas should educate society about the importance of cow protection.
  5. Ksatriyas should become leaders in legislating cow protection.
  6. Vaisyas should personally take up the task of protecting cows and bulls or should hire others to do it.
  7. Sudras should assist the three other sectors of society in cow protection.

Boycotting Dairy Products:

  1. Indicates a failure to understand the importance of milk for human society and especially for devotees of Krishna.
  2. Disregards God’s and nature’s arrangement of cooperation between humans and animals as pronounced in the Vedas, the Bible and the Koran, etc.
  3. Rests on fallacious ideas.
  4. Creates more problems than it solves (mäyä-sukhäya bharam udvahato vimüòhän)
  5. Hastens slaughter of cows because milkless cows will be seen as valueless to human society.
  6. Is an attempt to be more moral and intelligent than the acarya
  7. Is a dubious method of spreading Krishna consciousness.

We do not expect the task of establishing cow protection to come easily but it is our duty to try our best.

Just like in your country it is very chilly in the morning to take bath, a little difficult task. But does it mean that those who are devotees, they will stop taking bath? No. Even it is chilly, cold, one must take bath. The duty must be done. The duty must be done. Even it is little suffering. That is called tapasya. Tapasya means we must prolong or proceed with, with our Kåñëa consciousness business in spite of all dangerous and calamitous condition of this world. This is called tapasya. Tapasya means voluntarily accepting the difficulties of life. (From a lecture by Srila Prabhupada given in Los Angeles, April 17, 1973)

Anyone interested in participating in this project is invited to contact me. Hare Krishna.

Danavir Goswami
Rupanuga Vedic College
5201 Paseo, Kansas City, Missouri 64110
Tel: (816) 924-5619, Fax: (816) 924-5640
E-mail: danavir.goswami@pamho.net  Website: www.rvc.edu
Skype: DanavirGoswami

 

https://i1.wp.com/danavirgoswami.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/cow_6.jpg?fit=960%2C960https://i1.wp.com/danavirgoswami.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/cow_6.jpg?resize=150%2C150DG ServantArticlesDairyFeatured ArticlesDanavir GoswamiBy His Holiness Danavir Goswami (Vaiñëava Society Vol. 12) In this paper, we’ll address concerns coming from devotees of Lord Krishna, vegans and others regarding the use of commercial, organic and devotional dairy products. We propose a four point plan/solution as follows: 1)      Resist the trend to boycott milk products 2)      Establish...